Kamala Harris doesn’t want regime change in Iran: ‘Dangerous and unnecessary’

Kamala Harris has joined other far-left Dems by stating that she doesn’t support regime change in Iran.

The former vice president posted her critique of Operation Epic Fury and President Donald Trump shortly after Saturday’s attack began.

Harris described the attack as “a war American people do not want.”

Her statement comes despite Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and 10 high-ranking leaders in his fortified compound, as well over 40 top Iranian security and regime figures, Israeli officials said.

“Let me be clear: I am opposed to a regime-change war in Iran, and our troops are being put in harm’s way for the sake of Trump’s war of choice,” Harris wrote in a statement posted on X Saturday.

“This is a dangerous and unnecessary gamble with American lives that also jeopardizes stability in the region and our standing in the world. What we are witnessing is not strength. It is recklessness dressed up as resolve.”

The former VP then claimed she is well aware of the “threat that Iran poses” and agreed that they “must never be allowed to have a nuclear weapon,” but said that “this is not the way to dismantle that threat.”

---

Download The California Post App, follow us on social, and subscribe to our newsletters

Harris then attacked the president as a liar for not only saying during the presidential campaign, that he would “end wars rather than start them,” but also for saying that the US had “obliterated” Iran’s nuclear program” last year.

“And let us all be clear-eyed about what comes next. The President has already said this conflict may produce American casualties…Our troops deserve a Commander-in-Chief who approaches decisions on matters of war and peace with the same steadiness and discipline our troops show every day. Under the Constitution of the United States, the President must receive authorization from Congress to enter a war,” the former VP went on.

Harris closed out her statement declaring that actions on Saturday were “unwise, unjustified, and not supported by the American people.”

“There can be no equivocation in our opposition to Donald Trump’s war of choice, and Congress must use all available power to prevent him from further committing us to this conflict. Our troops, our allies, and the American people deserve nothing less.”

Harris immediately faced criticism on social media from those who questioned her leadership ability.

“Thank You Kamala! We Love You! Sincerely, The Mullahs,” wrote longtime Israeli supporter and advocate John Ondrasik of the music group Five for Fighting.

Another person added, “When you can put a sentence together, we’ll consider listening.”

While a third wrote, “What the ‘American people want’ has always seemed to have eluded you. Try to stop confusing it with ‘what we want the American people to want.’  When the polls come out next week, you will again be totally surprised by how unpopular your positions are.”

Fellow Democrat California Gov. Gavin Newsom also attacked Trump for Saturday’s operation in Iran and got destroyed for labeling the airstrikes in Iran “illegal, dangerous war” while ripping President Trump’s decision to attack Tehran.

“The corrupt and repressive Iranian regime must never have nuclear weapons. The leadership of Iran must go,” Newsom wrote on X Saturday, after the US and Israel launched the coordinated strikes early that morning.

“But that does not justify the President of the United States engaging in an illegal, dangerous war that will risk the lives of our American service members and our friends without justification to the American people.

The comments earned immediate criticism from those who questioned the potential 2028 presidential candidate‘s position.

“Which one is Gavin? They can’t have nuclear weapons and need to be removed? Or is the operation not justified?” one X user responded. “Pick one stance please. If you want to run for President, you should get comfortable making bold statements on where you stand.”

Another defended Trump’s authority, arguing Trump was within his constitutional powers to authorize the strikes: writing: “Not illegal — but you’d have to be able to read the Constitution to know that,” the user wrote.

The military action followed weeks of stalled talks over Iran’s refusal to dismantle its nuclear program.