in

Damian Lillard is back with the Trail Blazers: Good move or bad move? Plus, other NBA reunions we'd like to see

It’s Dame Time again in Portland. Damian Lillard has agreed to a 3-year deal to return to the Trail Blazers, after the Bucks waived the star guard earlier this month. Lillard, who is recovering from a torn Achilles tendon, spent his first 11 seasons in Portland and is expected to be ready for the 2026-27 season. What should we make of the reunion? Let’s break it down.

Good move or bad move for Dame?

Dan Devine: Great move for Dame. Lillard returns to the franchise where he’s a legend, to the city where he’s a made man and, most important of all, to the home where he can be with his three children each and every day — a massive quality-of-life improvement for a player who’d been very vocal about the difficulties of being away from his family during his two years in Milwaukee.

Advertisement

Oh, and Dame will get the Blazers’ full $14.1 million non-taxpayer midlevel exception on a three-year deal. That comes with a player option for 2027-28 — potentially allowing him to re-enter unrestricted free agency for one more big score at age 37 — and a full no-trade clause. So: Between his waived-and-stretched deal with the Bucks and the new agreement with the Blazers, Lillard’s in line to make $141 million over the next two seasons. To take the entirety of next year off to rehab his surgically repaired Achilles; to do it from the comforts of his own home; to put a regrettable period behind him; and to return to a city that adores him? Nice work if you can get it.

Ben Rohrbach: Great move. Who doesn’t like a grand reunion? It didn’t even seem like Lillard was ever fully sold on the idea of leaving Portland, the future Hall of Famer loved it so much. To have the chance to finish his career where it started, shepherding the next generation of great Blazers, is storybook stuff. In the meantime, he gets paid handsomely to rehab his torn Achilles tendon. What, exactly, is not to like?

Dan Titus: Good move, for sure. Sometimes it’s deeper than basketball. Lillard returns to a beloved fan base and franchise that has supported him throughout his Hall of Fame career. He could’ve chased rings, but instead, Lillard chose family. At the end of the day, he’s getting paid a ridiculous amount of money over the next two seasons to rehab an Achilles injury, and we don’t know how he’ll look when he returns. Lillard joins a young, ascending team, has earned himself a no-trade clause and will retire as the best Blazer in history. Sounds like a win across the board.

Good move or bad move for the Blazers?

Rohrbach: Meh? Lillard will sell tickets in Portland upon his return, but will the Blazers really want to hand the keys back to a high-usage 36-year-old who has rehabbed from a devastating injury a season from now, when the franchise will be years into the process of trying to emerge from Lillard’s shadow? That depends on whether Lillard is willing to accept a diminished role behind any emerging young talent.

Advertisement

Titus: With Paul Allen’s estate announcing it’s selling the team, I understand the decision to reacquire a star who can help drive revenue during a sale. The Blazers also wisely drafted Yang Hansen, who gives broader appeal to global audiences. Optically, it’s the right move. Basketball-wise, it’s more of a wait-and-see. I’m not sure how bringing back Dame accelerates Scoot Henderson’s development. It probably stifles it somewhat, but overall, I like how Portland has reshaped its roster and is moving closer toward a contender than a pretender.

source

New York Times Backtracks: US Strikes 'Destroyed' Iran's Nuke Site Capabilities, Could Take 'Years To Rebuild'

What we're hearing in the transfer window: Sancho, Rashford headed to Juve?